Some of those are Accesories, but still good list Sega Genesis, Just How many Add-ons this ...
Only two: The Mega-CD and the Super 32X.
far too many
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Youre just using anything and everything
And plus, Sega CD was really good, if only Sega decided to concentrate all effort into ONE system, as well not make so many silly decisions with the Mega Drive...
[QUOTE=''FirstDiscovery'']Youre just using anything and everything And plus, Sega CD was really good, if only Sega decided to concentrate all effort into ONE system, as well not make so many silly decisions with the Mega Drive...[/QUOTE]They did concentrated on one system for 6 years.
[QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei'']Only two: The Mega-CD and the Super 32X.[/QUOTE]What about Sonic %26 Knuckles :P? (I'm only counting first party stuff you could shove into your Genesis. No Nomad.)
*psst* I think that you may forget about multitap for Sega Genesis. I remembered that few EA games allowed to play up to 4 players.
[QUOTE=''FirstDiscovery'']Youre just using anything and everything
And plus, Sega CD was really good, if only Sega decided to concentrate all effort into ONE system, as well not make so many silly decisions with the Mega Drive...[/QUOTE]
hey buddy, get off the defense there. I'm not criticizing the system, but only pointing all the expansive options the console had.
does anyone have a picture of all that stuff connected at once?
why did it have a modem? there wore online games?
it failed big time once I saw cd 32x games lol
[QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei''][QUOTE=''FirstDiscovery'']Youre just using anything and everything And plus, Sega CD was really good, if only Sega decided to concentrate all effort into ONE system, as well not make so many silly decisions with the Mega Drive...[/QUOTE]They did concentrated on one system for 6 years.[/QUOTE]Well has the concentrated on just the SegaCD or 32x, either system wouldve been far better. Offcourse your Sega knowledge is vastly ahead of mine, but didnt they kinda blow their own lead after 1992 due to laziness?
[QUOTE=''clsmithj''][QUOTE=''FirstDiscovery'']Youre just using anything and everything
And plus, Sega CD was really good, if only Sega decided to concentrate all effort into ONE system, as well not make so many silly decisions with the Mega Drive...[/QUOTE]
hey buddy, get off the defense there. I'm not criticizing the system, but only pointing all the expansive options the console had.[/QUOTE]Fair enough, but its just the MD is laughed at for its options, when in fact the SegaCD was really good.
what did the activator do? Also what was the modem for? And Sega channel?
[QUOTE=''FirstDiscovery''][QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei''][QUOTE=''FirstDiscovery'']Youre just using anything and everything And plus, Sega CD was really good, if only Sega decided to concentrate all effort into ONE system, as well not make so many silly decisions with the Mega Drive...[/QUOTE]They did concentrated on one system for 6 years.[/QUOTE]Well has the concentrated on just the SegaCD or 32x, either system wouldve been far better. Offcourse your Sega knowledge is vastly ahead of mine, but didnt they kinda blow their own lead after 1992 due to laziness?[/QUOTE]Laziness? Like what? 1992 was one of the most supported years of the system.
The Super 32X didn't came out until 1994, alosngisde the Saturn. And that was 6 years after the system release. And the only reason why they even released it was to try to keep the interest in the system going, since it had already decreased significatively. Yes, even before the Super 32X.The Mega didn't loss its market advantage to the SFC in the US until 1994, but since mid 1993 it became obvious it was going to happen. In Europe the system remained the dominant one, and in Japan it never was. That the system wasn't successful in Japan is what really set the way of the MD. Still, the system was prolific for 6 years, and comparatively, the MD got better support on its six year in 1994 than the SFC in 1996. The MD was the system that dominated the US and EU markets the entire generation, despite what the majority in her would like to belive. The SFC actually sold the most after its generation was over and, but it profited from a much beter and bigger video game market than in the past years, and alongside with it's popularity worldwide, it allowed it to outsold the MD in the end by a great margin, just not while they were going against each other.
[QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei'']The MD was the system that dominated the US and EU markets the entire generation, despite what the majority in here would like to belive.
[/QUOTE]Eh, I still believe the SNES won, but it was pretty damn close. Sonic put a major dent in the Nintendo empire...which only lasted about 6 years :P.
[QUOTE=''Video_Game_King''][QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei'']The MD was the system that dominated the US and EU markets the entire generation, despite what the majority in here would like to belive.
[/QUOTE]Eh, I still believe the SNES won, but it was pretty damn close. Sonic put a major dent in the Nintendo empire...which only lasted about 6 years :P.[/QUOTE]As an example I can say that I was much happier as a SEGA gamer in those years than having to say that a certain console ''won'' in the end. And many SEGA owners would agree. Just because the Wii sells more hardware doesn't mean it is the best gaming console out there or has better software title.
[QUOTE=''Video_Game_King''][QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei'']The MD was the system that dominated the US and EU markets the entire generation, despite what the majority in here would like to belive.
[/QUOTE]Eh, I still believe the SNES won, but it was pretty damn close. Sonic put a major dent in the Nintendo empire...which only lasted about 6 years :P.[/QUOTE]No it didn't. The MD led the entire generation. The SFC didn't outidid the MD until the last years of the generation. The SFC sold the most from 1994 and on, not before it.
[QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei''][QUOTE=''Video_Game_King''][QUOTE=''Panzer_Zwei'']The MD was the system that dominated the US and EU markets the entire generation, despite what the majority in here would like to belive.
[/QUOTE]Eh, I still believe the SNES won, but it was pretty damn close. Sonic put a major dent in the Nintendo empire...which only lasted about 6 years :P.[/QUOTE]No it didn't. The MD led the entire generation. The SFC didn't outidid the MD until the last years of the generation. The SFC sold the most from 1994 and on, not before it.
[/QUOTE]Your definition is a bit stiff. Shouldn't the victor be decided by both financial and critical success? Nintendo had the critical thing down. Often times, the SNES port of a certain game was better than the Genesis (even if both versions weren't that good). I could cite exclusives, but that would get ugly.
No comments:
Post a Comment